🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting amendments to a pending law that include decreasing the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid broader worries about industry interference with health policies. Recently, international health experts sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of business advocacy globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” stated Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “according to global guideline limits”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities actually suggests a caution must occupy at least 50% of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for multiple violations “extending from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the managing director of the Zambian branch claims the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We exist in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my community's youth are perishing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “The corporation runs its activities following with current country statutes. Moreover, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which provide for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The company was “not against rules”, they said, noting that young individuals should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to accomplish desired public health goals, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, noting that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which includes growing volumes of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.