🔗 Share this article

During the previous presidential campaign, Donald Trump courted voters with promises to lower prices immediately upon taking office. However, once he assumed office, there was precious little focus to the cost of living. All that changed following inflation-weary voters expressed dissatisfaction at the polls. Shortly thereafter, his team launched a slapdash campaign to tackle affordability. Unfortunately, this initiative is a hot mess—filled with absurdity, contradictions, unrealistic expectations, scapegoating, and misleading statements.

Detached Assertions and Grocery Store Truth

Just two days post-election, Trump kicked off his affordability drive with a disastrous statement: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” This comment from the wealthy leader—often associates with fellow billionaires—demonstrated utter contempt for everyday citizens who struggle when visiting supermarkets. In effect, he dismissed their struggles as unimportant, suggesting they had it wrong about price levels.

His assertion about declining prices proved highly misleading and inaccurate. In what way could all costs be decreasing when his cherished tariffs were increasing prices? Recent data show the cost of bananas increased 6.9% in the last twelve months, beef prices went up almost 15%, and coffee prices surged 18.9%—in part because of import taxes applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, prices rose in five of the six main grocery groups tracked by the government’s price index, including meats, poultry, and fish (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (up 2.8%), and fruits and vegetables (rising slightly).

Inconsistencies and Inaccuracies in Financial Claims

In spite of these numbers, Trump continues to push his misleading narrative about affordability. Since election day, he has claimed there is “virtually no inflation,” declared “prices are way down,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” These statements ignore the reality that prices overall have clearly increased since Biden left office. At present, price growth is running at a 3 percent per year, that’s 50% higher than the central bank’s 2% goal. Adding to the inaccuracies, he boasted that gas prices had fallen to nearly $2 a gallon, even though official data indicate they are over three dollars.

Confronted by reality and lower approval ratings, advisers apparently cautioned that his “costs are falling” message portrayed him as disconnected from ordinary people. Many citizens are frustrated about prices continuing to climb after promises of reductions. In response, aides suggested one quick fix: roll back certain import taxes. The logical move contradicted Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs wouldn’t raise prices for US consumers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Potential Impact

With some tariffs reduced on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, Trump will likely announce that he has lowered costs once these products begin to fall in price. This would be similar to a firestarter boasting for extinguishing a fire that he ignited. On another occasion, when addressing fast-food leaders, Trump declared that “we are in the golden age of America” and told listeners that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” These comments come naturally for a wealthy individual to make, but seem insincere to countless households facing hardships—particularly when many face losing food stamps or rising insurance costs.

Per a survey conducted last fall, three-quarters of respondents believe the state of the economy are fair or poor, while just a quarter consider them positive. Another poll found that a majority of citizens feel Trump’s policies have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Economic Reality and Proposed Steps

Scott Bessent, the president’s top economic official, recently disputed claims of a golden age. He noted that far from booming, some parts of the American economy “have contracted.” Industrial production—a priority for the administration—seems to have shrunk for multiple consecutive months and lost around 33,000 jobs since January. Pointing to these challenges, the secretary urged the central bank to cut interest rates—an action that could help affordability.

In response to widespread concern about living costs, Trump suggested a cash handout of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” not for “the wealthy.” To numerous struggling Americans, this sounds like a financial lifeline, but it is unlikely that Congress—already alarmed about huge budget deficits—will enact such a plan. This idea could increase federal spending, increase borrowing costs, and possibly drive prices higher by injecting cash into consumers’ pockets.

Another proposed solution for cost issues involved creating 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that this would reduce monthly mortgage payments. But, reality is that such lengthy loans would do little to lower monthly payments—frequently reducing them by just $100 or $200 per month. The drawback is that these mortgages could more than double the overall cost borrowers pay and hinder building home value.

Faulting the Previous Administration and Economic Outlook

In their affordability campaign, Trump and his team have once more pointed fingers at Biden for financial challenges, such as increasing costs. Spokespeople stated they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “addressing Biden’s inflation.” These are unfounded and inaccurate allegations. In reality, the former president left a robust economic situation, with inflation way down, solid expansion, and unemployment low. But, the current administration’s actions—particularly his tariffs—have resulted in an difficult situation, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

According to Mark Zandi, chief economist at a research firm, numerous regions are already in recession, with their economies damaged by the administration’s trade policies. He fears that if key regions such as major economies enter a downturn, the nation could slide into a widespread recession. In downturns, people generally possess less money to spend, and inflation usually declines. Sadly, given the highly-touted cost initiative likely to do little to control costs, his primary method for achieving increased affordability might prove to be triggering an economic contraction—a scenario that struggling Americans cannot handle.